Influence of new thermal storage schemes based on modular phase change floors on building heating performance
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
CC BY
CC BY
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Authors
Date
2025-06-15
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
13
Series
Journal of Energy Storage, Volume 121, pp. 1-13
Abstract
The application of convenient modular construction has become a popular building approach. The modularity of phase change floors (PCFs) provides the possibility for flexible heating and energy storage in buildings. This study designs two new thermal storage schemes based on modular PCFs: cascade and partial thermal storage to enhance the PCFs' heating performance. A PCF simulation model is developed and verified by comparing ANSYS simulation results and experimental measurements. Then, heating and cooling processes of PCF heating rooms using different heating methods (full/local) and thermal storage schemes (full/cascade/partial) are comparatively analyzed. The results show that at full heating, the room's thermal comfort is reduced with cascade and partial thermal storage compared to full thermal storage, but the energy efficiency and economic performance are improved with partial thermal storage. Localized overheating of the floor surface occurs with cascade/partial thermal storage. While cascade thermal storage can enhance the melting of phase change materials (PCMs), low-temperature PCMs are prone to incomplete solidification. Partial thermal storage can save up to 2 % of energy over full thermal storage. In addition, with local heating, changes in thermal storage schemes essentially do not affect the room's thermal comfort. Partial thermal storage still offers the best energy efficiency and economic performance. It has a payback period of less than 6.5 years, which is about 2.6 years shorter than full thermal storage. Rooms with different heating methods have different suitable thermal storage schemes.Description
Publisher Copyright: © 2025 The Authors
Keywords
Cascade thermal storage, Energy saving, Local heating, Numerical simulation, Phase change floor (PCF)
Other note
Citation
Wang, T, Wang, H & Luo, Z 2025, ' Influence of new thermal storage schemes based on modular phase change floors on building heating performance ', Journal of Energy Storage, vol. 121, 116520, pp. 1-13 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2025.116520