Systems Thinking Accident Analysis Models: A Systematic Review for Sustainable Safety Management

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorDelikhoon, Mahdiehen_US
dc.contributor.authorZarei, Esmaeilen_US
dc.contributor.authorValdez Banda, Osirisen_US
dc.contributor.authorFaridan, Mohammaden_US
dc.contributor.authorHabibi, Ehsanollahen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Energy and Mechanical Engineeringen
dc.contributor.groupauthorMarine Technologyen
dc.contributor.organizationIsfahan University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.organizationMemorial University of Newfoundlanden_US
dc.contributor.organizationLorestan University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-24T05:12:59Z
dc.date.available2022-05-24T05:12:59Z
dc.date.issued2022-05-01en_US
dc.description.abstractAccident models are mental models that make it possible to understand the causality of adverse events. This research was conducted based on five major objectives: (i) to systematically review the relevant literature about AcciMap, STAMP, and FRAM models and synthesize the theoretical and experimental findings, as well as the main research flows; (ii) to examine the standalone and hybrid applications for modeling the leading factors of the accident and the behavior of sociotechnical systems; (iii) to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of exploring the research opportunities; (iv) to describe the safety and accident models in terms of safety-I-II-III; and finally, to investigate the impact of the systemic models’ applications in enhancing the system’s sustainability. The systematic models can identify contributory factors, functions, and relationships in different system levels which helps to increase the awareness of systems and enhance the sustainability of safety management. Furthermore, their hybrid extensions can significantly overcome the limitations of these models and provide more reliable information. Applying the safety II and III concepts and their approaches in the system can also progress their safety levels. Finally, the ethical control of sophisticated systems suggests that further research utilizing these methodologies should be conducted to enhance system analysis and safety evaluations.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent28
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationDelikhoon, M, Zarei, E, Valdez Banda, O, Faridan, M & Habibi, E 2022, ' Systems Thinking Accident Analysis Models: A Systematic Review for Sustainable Safety Management ', SUSTAINABILITY, vol. 14, no. 10, 5869 . https://doi.org/10.3390/su14105869en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su14105869en_US
dc.identifier.issn2071-1050
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 58b1c78f-9763-49c4-abbe-fc126e55535ben_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/58b1c78f-9763-49c4-abbe-fc126e55535ben_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE LINK: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130530173&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/83240376/sustainability_14_05869.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/114545
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202205243392
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofseriesSUSTAINABILITYen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 14, issue 10en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subject.keywordaccident analysesen_US
dc.subject.keywordAcciMapen_US
dc.subject.keywordSTAMPen_US
dc.subject.keywordFRAMen_US
dc.subject.keywordSafety-IIIen_US
dc.subject.keywordSustainable systemen_US
dc.titleSystems Thinking Accident Analysis Models: A Systematic Review for Sustainable Safety Managementen
dc.typeA2 Katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files