Does the Federal Reserve cause market bubbles by diverging from Taylor rule?

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorAhonen, Iisakki
dc.contributor.departmentRahoituksen laitosfi
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Financeen
dc.contributor.schoolKauppakorkeakoulufi
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Businessen
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-14T06:01:00Z
dc.date.available2016-06-14T06:01:00Z
dc.date.dateaccepted2016-02-10
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis, I study how the Federal Reserve affects financial market valuations and stock market liquidity. My work relates to previous literature that uses monetary policy tools to explain stock market liquidity and stock market volatility. Previous research confirms that monetary policy affects equity valuations and risk-aversion of investors. Austrian school theory views business cycles as a symptom of central bank interventionism in credit market and monetary field. Contribution of this thesis is to provide explanation on transmission mechanism of monetary policy to financial market valuations. Emphasis is on employing stock market liquidity as a transmission channel of monetary policy. I calculate how the Federal Reserve's short term rate has diverged from Taylor rule -implied rate, and define divergences from Taylor rule as expansive or restrictive monetary policy. I use Q-ratio to measure financial market valuations, which is a ratio between U.S. corporate equities and U.S. corporate net worth. I define stock market liquidity as price impact to dollar volume trading in NYSE/Amex stocks. Data spans from 1954 to 2007. My first new finding shows that monetary policy affects stock market liquidity. Standard deviation effect of monetary policy increases stock market liquidity during two quarters, and explains 54.3% of variation when controlling for autocorrelation. Second new finding shows that stock market liquidity affects financial market valuations. Standard deviation increase on stock market liquidity increases level changes in Q-ratio by 4.78%, and decreases by 4.9% in previous quarter. Effects are large compared to sample mean (1.57%), and explains 18.5% of the variation in Q-ratio levels. Results hold for numerous robustness tests. Parameter stability test shows that the estimated coefficients for my key findings are stable over time. I employ VAR -model for key variables to study joint movement of monetary policy, stock market liquidity, and Q-ratio. Based on this model, Granger causality -test shows that these variables Granger cause each other. Impulse response functions also confirm same effects I find for my new findings.en
dc.ethesisid14332
dc.format.extent57
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/20657
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-201609083367
dc.language.isoenen
dc.locationP1 I
dc.programme.majorRahoitusfi
dc.programme.majorFinanceen
dc.subject.heleconrahoitus
dc.subject.heleconfinancing
dc.subject.heleconrahapolitiikka
dc.subject.heleconmonetary policy
dc.subject.heleconosakemarkkinat
dc.subject.heleconstock markets
dc.subject.heleconlikviditeetti
dc.subject.heleconliquidity
dc.subject.keywordTaylor rule
dc.subject.keywordmonetary policy
dc.subject.keywordFederal Reserve
dc.subject.keywordQ-ratio
dc.subject.keywordAmihud illiquidity measure
dc.subject.keywordstock market liquidity
dc.subject.keywordAustrian school of economics
dc.subject.keywordVAR -model
dc.titleDoes the Federal Reserve cause market bubbles by diverging from Taylor rule?en
dc.typeG2 Pro gradu, diplomityöfi
dc.type.dcmitypetexten
dc.type.ontasotPro gradu tutkielmafi
dc.type.ontasotMaster's thesisen
local.aalto.idthes14332
local.aalto.openaccessyes

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
hse_ethesis_14332.pdf
Size:
1.26 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format