Wind Integration into Energy Systems with a High Share of Nuclear Power — What Are the Compromises?

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorZakeri, Behnamen_US
dc.contributor.authorRinne, Samulien_US
dc.contributor.authorSyri, Sannaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Energy Technologyen
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-11T09:15:04Z
dc.date.available2017-05-11T09:15:04Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.description.abstractTowards low-carbon energy systems, there are countries with ongoing plans for expanding their nuclear power capacity, and simultaneously advancing the role of variable renewable energy sources (RES), namely wind and solar energy. This crossroads of capital-intensive, baseload power production and uncontrollable, intermittent RES may entail new challenges in the optimal and economic operation of power systems. This study examines this case by hourly analysis of a national-level energy system with the EnergyPLAN modeling tool, coupled with wind integration simulations (including uncertainty) implemented using MATLAB. We evaluate the maximum feasible wind integration under different scenarios for nuclear power plants, energy demand, and the flexibility of energy infrastructure for a real case study (Finland). We propose wind-nuclear compromise charts to envision the impact of any mix of these two technologies on four parameters: total costs, power exchange, carbon emissions, and renewable energy integration. The results suggest that nuclear power constrains the room for maximum uptake of wind energy by a descending parabolic relationship. If nuclear power production exceeds 50% of the total power demand, wind will be unlikely to penetrate in shares over 15% of the respective demand. Moreover, we investigate the role of four flexibility options: demand side management, electrical energy storage, smart electric heating, and large-scale heat pumps (backed with thermal energy storage). Heat pumps (which are in connection with combined heat and power (CHP) and district heating systems) offer the highest efficiency in balancing excess power from variable RES. However, power-to-heat options offer a limited capability for absorbing excess power, as oversupply arises mainly in the periods with relatively low demand for heat. This calls for longer-term energy storage and/or other flexibility options to achieve the planned targets in wind-nuclear scenarios.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationZakeri, B, Rinne, S & Syri, S 2015, 'Wind Integration into Energy Systems with a High Share of Nuclear Power — What Are the Compromises?', Energies, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 2493-2527. https://doi.org/10.3390/en8042493en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en8042493en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: f1f8debc-a2d3-4993-bfe5-a8191c84aaffen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/f1f8debc-a2d3-4993-bfe5-a8191c84aaffen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE LINK: http://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/8/4/2493en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/12739850/energies_08_02493_v2.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/25962
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-201705114337
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnergiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 8, issue 4, pp. 2493-2527en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subject.keywordcarbon emissionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordelectricity marketen_US
dc.subject.keywordenergy planningen_US
dc.subject.keywordenergy storageen_US
dc.subject.keywordenergy system modelingen_US
dc.subject.keywordflexibility requirementen_US
dc.subject.keywordNordic power marketen_US
dc.subject.keywordrenewable energy policyen_US
dc.subject.keywordsmart energy systemen_US
dc.subject.keywordthermal power planten_US
dc.titleWind Integration into Energy Systems with a High Share of Nuclear Power — What Are the Compromises?en
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files