EU Emission Targets of 2050: Costs and CO2 Emissions Comparison of Three Different Solar and Heat Pump-Based Community-Level District Heating Systems in Nordic Conditions

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorRehman, Hassamen_US
dc.contributor.authorHirvonen, Janneen_US
dc.contributor.authorJokisalo, Juhaen_US
dc.contributor.authorKosonen, Ristoen_US
dc.contributor.authorSiren, Kaien_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Energy and Mechanical Engineeringen
dc.contributor.groupauthorEnergy efficiency and systemsen
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-21T08:29:31Z
dc.date.available2020-08-21T08:29:31Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-12en_US
dc.description| openaire: EC/H2020/856602/EU//FINEST TWINS
dc.description.abstractIn Finland, old apartments (1980s) contribute toward emissions. The objective is to reduce CO2 emissions to reach Europe’s targets of 2050. Three different centralized solar-based district heating systems integrated either with non-renovated or renovated old buildings in the community were simulated and compared against the reference city-level district heating system. The three proposed centralized systems were: Case 1: photovoltaic (PV) with a ground source heat pump (GSHP); Case 2: PV with an air-water heat pump (A2WHP); and Case 3: PV with A2WHPs, seasonal storage, and GSHPs. TRNSYS simulation software was used for dynamic simulation of the systems. Life cycle cost (LCC), CO2 emissions and purchased electricity were calculated and compared. The results show that the community-level district heating system (Case 3) outperformed Case 1, Case 2, and the city-level district heating. With non-renovated buildings, the relative emissions reduction was 83% when the reference energy system was replaced with Case 3 and the emissions reduction cost was 3.74 €/kg.CO2/yr. The relative emissions reduction was 91% when the buildings were deep renovated and integrated with Case 3 when compared to the reference system with non-renovated buildings and the emission reduction cost was 11.9 €/kg.CO2/yr. Such district heating systems could help in meeting Europe’s emissions target for 2050.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent29
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationRehman, H, Hirvonen, J, Jokisalo, J, Kosonen, R & Siren, K 2020, ' EU Emission Targets of 2050: Costs and CO2 Emissions Comparison of Three Different Solar and Heat Pump-Based Community-Level District Heating Systems in Nordic Conditions ', Energies, vol. 13, no. 16, 4167 . https://doi.org/10.3390/en13164167en
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/en13164167en_US
dc.identifier.issn1996-1073
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 61df56c1-ce17-47e1-a15f-133b232fcca0en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/61df56c1-ce17-47e1-a15f-133b232fcca0en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE LINK: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/16/4167#citeen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE LINK: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090903509&partnerID=8YFLogxKen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/44781161/Energies_Hassam_ur_Rehman.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/45805
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202008214800
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherMDPI AG
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/856602/EU//FINEST TWINSen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEnergiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 13, issue 16en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subject.keywordPV and heat pump-based centralized district heating systemen_US
dc.subject.keyworddistrict heating CO2 emissionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordseasonal storageen_US
dc.subject.keywordcommunity scale solutionsen_US
dc.subject.keywordold apartment buildings renovationen_US
dc.subject.keywordNordic conditionsen_US
dc.titleEU Emission Targets of 2050: Costs and CO2 Emissions Comparison of Three Different Solar and Heat Pump-Based Community-Level District Heating Systems in Nordic Conditionsen
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion

Files