What communication tools students use in software projects and how do different tools suit different parts of project work?
Loading...
Access rights
openAccess
publishedVersion
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A4 Artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussa
This publication is imported from Aalto University research portal.
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
View publication in the Research portal (opens in new window)
View/Open full text file from the Research portal (opens in new window)
Other link related to publication (opens in new window)
Date
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
Series
Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion, pp. 432-435
Abstract
In software engineering education, the goal is often to provide students with authentic assignments using actual tools of the trade. Students are often allowed to select their preferred tools without specifying what to use for e.g. communication within the team, scheduling, bug tracking, etc. However, there is an abundance of tools to choose from with more appearing rapidly, which can make it difficult for students or staff to select appropriate tools for each task. In this paper, we study the suitability of several commonly used communication and collaboration tools on different tasks that students encounter in team assignments. We surveyed students' experiences with different tools in a university-level web software development course.Description
Keywords
Other note
Citation
Seppälä, O, Auvinen, T, Karavirta, V, Vihavainen, A & Ihantola, P 2016, What communication tools students use in software projects and how do different tools suit different parts of project work? in Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Software Engineering Companion. IEEE, pp. 432-435, International Conference on Software Engineering, Austin, Texas, United States, 14/05/2016. https://doi.org/10.1145/2889160.2889196