Storm-time ring current: model-dependent results
Loading...
Access rights
© Authors 2012. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License
Final published version
URL
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
School of Electrical Engineering |
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Date
Department
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
177-202
Series
Annales Geophysicae, Vol. 30, nro 1
Abstract
The main point of the paper is to investigate how much the modeled ring current depends on the representations of magnetic and electric fields and boundary conditions used in simulations. Two storm events, one moderate (SymH minimum of −120 nT) on 6–7 November 1997 and one intense (SymH minimum of −230 nT) on 21–22 October 1999, are modeled. A rather simple ring current model is employed, namely, the Inner Magnetosphere Particle Transport and Acceleration model (IMPTAM), in order to make the results most evident. Four different magnetic field and two electric field representations and four boundary conditions are used. We find that different combinations of the magnetic and electric field configurations and boundary conditions result in very different modeled ring current, and, therefore, the physical conclusions based on simulation results can differ significantly. A time-dependent boundary outside of 6.6 RE gives a possibility to take into account the particles in the transition region (between dipole and stretched field lines) forming partial ring current and near-Earth tail current in that region. Calculating the model SymH* by Biot-Savart's law instead of the widely used Dessler-Parker-Sckopke (DPS) relation gives larger and more realistic values, since the currents are calculated in the regions with nondipolar magnetic field. Therefore, the boundary location and the method of SymH* calculation are of key importance for ring current data-model comparisons to be correctly interpreted.Description
Other note
Citation
Ganushkina, N. Yu. & Liemohn, M. W. & Pulkkinen, Tuija I. 2012. Storm-time ring current: model-dependent results. Annales Geophysicae, Vol. 30, nro 1. pp. 177-202. 1432-0576 (electronic). DOI: 10.5194/angeo-30-177-2012.