Determinants of takeover success and the role of investor protection in cross-border tender offers

No Thumbnail Available
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
School of Economics | Master's thesis
Degree programme
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY In this thesis I examine tender offers and the determinants which significantly affect their outcome. The focus is on revealing the determinants which help acquirers anticipate the outcome of the offer already before the offer is announced. First, I attempt to find the deal specific determinants which most significantly affect the outcome of tender offers. The second objective of this paper is to measure the country-level differences in investor protection and the effects of these differences to the outcome of the offer. In addition, I try to alleviate the ambiguity relating to the effect of the tender offer premium offered to the shareholders by adding a variable whether the offer price exceeds the target 52-week high price. I also study the determinants in special situations such as hostile and competed offers. DATA AND METHODOLOGY A sample of 3783 tender offers from 38 countries was gathered from SDC Platinum. The sample included offers announced and completed during the time period spanning from 1986 to 2010. Supplementary stock price data was collected from Thomson ONE Banker. The investor protection measures, the anti-director rights index used as a proxy for shareholder protection and the creditor rights index are from the papers by Spamann (2010) and Djankov et al. (2007), respectively. The measures for law enforcement and the level of corruption are obtained from World Bank databases. Logistic regression method was used to analyze the data. RESULTS Shareholder protection is found to have no effect on the outcome of the offer which adds to the findings of Spamann (2010). High level of creditor rights in the target country decreases the probability of success. Hostile attitude and competition among bidders are found to be the most significant determinants of tender offer success. Both have a negative effect on the outcome. I find the one week offer premium to have a positive impact of the outcome of a tender offer. The effect fades when the variable for offer price exceeding the target 52-week high is added. This confirms that after exceeding a certain level the significance of the premium is low. Contrary to previous findings toeholds are found to have a significant impact only in hostile offers.
Acquisition, takeover, tender offer, reference point, corporate governance, investor protection
Other note