Mapping the Landscape of Peer Review in Computing Education Research

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorPetre, Marianen_US
dc.contributor.authorSanders, Kateen_US
dc.contributor.authorMcCartney, Roberten_US
dc.contributor.authorAhmadzadeh, Marziehen_US
dc.contributor.authorConnolly, Corneliaen_US
dc.contributor.authorHamouda, Sallyen_US
dc.contributor.authorHarrington, Brianen_US
dc.contributor.authorLumbroso, Jérémieen_US
dc.contributor.authorMaguire, Josephen_US
dc.contributor.authorMalmi, Laurien_US
dc.contributor.authorMcGill, Monica M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorVahrenhold, Janen_US
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Computer Scienceen
dc.contributor.groupauthorProfessorship Malmi L.en
dc.contributor.organizationOpen Universityen_US
dc.contributor.organizationRhode Island Collegeen_US
dc.contributor.organizationUniversity of Connecticuten_US
dc.contributor.organizationYork University Torontoen_US
dc.contributor.organizationNational University of Ireland, Galwayen_US
dc.contributor.organizationUniversity of Torontoen_US
dc.contributor.organizationPrinceton Universityen_US
dc.contributor.organizationUniversity of Glasgowen_US
dc.contributor.organizationKnox Collegeen_US
dc.contributor.organizationWestfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münsteren_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-25T10:15:31Z
dc.date.available2021-01-25T10:15:31Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-17en_US
dc.description.abstractPeer review is a mainstay of academic publication -- indeed, it is the peer-review process that provides much of the publications' credibility. As the number of computing education conferences and the number of submissions increase, the need for reviewers grows. This report does not attempt to set standards for reviewing; rather, as a first step toward meeting the need for well qualified reviewers, it presents an overview of the ways peer review is used in various venues, both inside computing education and, for comparison, in closely-related areas outside our field. It considers four key components of peer review in some depth: criteria, the review process, roles and responsibilities, and ethics and etiquette. To do so, it draws on relevant literature, guidance and forms associated with peer review, interviews with journal editors and conference chairs, and a limited survey of the computing education research community. In addition to providing an overview of practice, this report identifies a number of themes running through the discourse that have relevance for decision making about how best to conduct peer review for a given venue.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent173–209
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.identifier.citationPetre, M, Sanders, K, McCartney, R, Ahmadzadeh, M, Connolly, C, Hamouda, S, Harrington, B, Lumbroso, J, Maguire, J, Malmi, L, McGill, M M & Vahrenhold, J 2020, Mapping the Landscape of Peer Review in Computing Education Research . in ITiCSE-WGR 2020 - Proceedings of the Working Group Reports on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education ., 3439207, ITiCSE Working Group Reports, ACM, pp. 173–209, Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Trondheim, Norway, 15/06/2020 . https://doi.org/10.1145/3437800.3439207en
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/3437800.3439207en_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781450368742
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 9b2cb145-e3fd-48f4-929f-72c2b45d3c62en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/9b2cb145-e3fd-48f4-929f-72c2b45d3c62en_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE LINK: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85098699519&partnerID=8YFLogxKen_US
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/54772642/SCI_Malmi2020_Mapping_the_Landscape_of_Peer_Review.pdfen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/102216
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202101251526
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherACM
dc.relation.ispartofAnnual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Educationen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesITiCSE 2020 - Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Educationen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesITiCSE Working Group Reportsen
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subject.keywordpeer reviewen_US
dc.subject.keywordcomputing educationen_US
dc.subject.keywordpeer review criteriaen_US
dc.subject.keywordpeer review processen_US
dc.subject.keywordpeer review rolesen_US
dc.subject.keywordpeer review ethicsen_US
dc.titleMapping the Landscape of Peer Review in Computing Education Researchen
dc.typeA4 Artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussafi
dc.type.versionacceptedVersion

Files