Are ‘tiny homes’ good for the environment? Focus on materials, land-use, energy, and carbon footprint

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorKuittinen, Matti
dc.contributor.authorRuuska, Ksenia
dc.contributor.authorViriyaroj, Bergpob
dc.contributor.authorZubillaga, Laura
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Architecture
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Architectureen
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-17T08:07:09Z
dc.date.available2024-01-17T08:07:09Z
dc.date.issued2024-01-03
dc.descriptionPublisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
dc.description.abstractMaterial consumption and greenhouse gas emissions are rising in building stocks. At the same time, the floor area of residential buildings per capita has been increasing. New houses can be very energy efficient but are often built from energy and emission-intensive materials. We investigated the potential of tiny homes for reducing material use, energy consumption, and associated emissions, as well as land use. For this study, comparative life cycle assessments and energy simulations were conducted on tiny homes, detached houses, and apartments in the context of Finland, Northern Europe. The results allow comparison between different building types. The studied tiny homes had lower energy consumption and carbon footprints than the reference buildings when comparing these indicators per capita or per building. However, when using floor area as a unit of comparison, the tiny homes perform worse. When looking at land use efficiency, tiny homes and apartment blocks performed better than detached houses. We conclude that, as tiny homes are strongly related to individual lifestyles, their overall relevance for lowering environmental impacts should be compared in relation to consumption habits and use of public services. Furthermore, the environmental benefits of tiny homes need to be interpreted in a broader sustainability context, especially in relation to indicators of social and economic sustainability.en
dc.description.versionPeer revieweden
dc.format.extent25
dc.format.extent698-722
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.citationKuittinen , M , Ruuska , K , Viriyaroj , B & Zubillaga , L 2024 , ' Are ‘tiny homes’ good for the environment? Focus on materials, land-use, energy, and carbon footprint ' , JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE , vol. 28 , no. 5 , pp. 698-722 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2023.2280849en
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13602365.2023.2280849
dc.identifier.issn1360-2365
dc.identifier.otherPURE UUID: 037213be-c52d-4652-8d71-0c511a151a6e
dc.identifier.otherPURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/037213be-c52d-4652-8d71-0c511a151a6e
dc.identifier.otherPURE LINK: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85180215089&partnerID=8YFLogxK
dc.identifier.otherPURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/133575312/Are_tiny_homes_good_for_the_environment_Focus_on_materials_land-use_energy_and_carbon_footprint_pdfa1b.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/125744
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-202401171419
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRoutledge
dc.relation.ispartofseriesJOURNAL OF ARCHITECTUREen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesVolume 28, issue 5en
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.titleAre ‘tiny homes’ good for the environment? Focus on materials, land-use, energy, and carbon footprinten
dc.typeA1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessäfi
dc.type.versionpublishedVersion
Files