Are ‘tiny homes’ good for the environment? Focus on materials, land-use, energy, and carbon footprint

Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Date
2024-01-03
Major/Subject
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
25
698-722
Series
JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE, Volume 28, issue 5
Abstract
Material consumption and greenhouse gas emissions are rising in building stocks. At the same time, the floor area of residential buildings per capita has been increasing. New houses can be very energy efficient but are often built from energy and emission-intensive materials. We investigated the potential of tiny homes for reducing material use, energy consumption, and associated emissions, as well as land use. For this study, comparative life cycle assessments and energy simulations were conducted on tiny homes, detached houses, and apartments in the context of Finland, Northern Europe. The results allow comparison between different building types. The studied tiny homes had lower energy consumption and carbon footprints than the reference buildings when comparing these indicators per capita or per building. However, when using floor area as a unit of comparison, the tiny homes perform worse. When looking at land use efficiency, tiny homes and apartment blocks performed better than detached houses. We conclude that, as tiny homes are strongly related to individual lifestyles, their overall relevance for lowering environmental impacts should be compared in relation to consumption habits and use of public services. Furthermore, the environmental benefits of tiny homes need to be interpreted in a broader sustainability context, especially in relation to indicators of social and economic sustainability.
Description
Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
Keywords
Other note
Citation
Kuittinen , M , Ruuska , K , Viriyaroj , B & Zubillaga , L 2024 , ' Are ‘tiny homes’ good for the environment? Focus on materials, land-use, energy, and carbon footprint ' , JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURE , vol. 28 , no. 5 , pp. 698-722 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2023.2280849