Democracy and Development: causality analysis using fsQCA

dc.contributorAalto-yliopistofi
dc.contributorAalto Universityen
dc.contributor.authorBelai, Yonas Embaye
dc.contributor.departmentTaloustieteen laitosfi
dc.contributor.departmentDepartment of Economicsen
dc.contributor.schoolKauppakorkeakoulufi
dc.contributor.schoolSchool of Businessen
dc.date.accessioned2015-11-04T13:21:20Z
dc.date.available2015-11-04T13:21:20Z
dc.date.dateaccepted2015-06-22
dc.date.issued2015
dc.description.abstractSince the industrial revolution, development has been at the center of politics and politics at the center of development. Whether democratic type of government or autocratic perform better has been discussed among economists and political scientists alike for years. The emergence of autocratic governments in South East Asia as champions in bringing fast growth has fueled the debate even more. Many dictatorships have made the success of these countries as a tool to question the attributes of democracy and in return legitimize their grip. Even though, democracy has its own merit irrespective of whether it brings fast growth or not, it is still a worthy cause to learn about its effectiveness more. Development and poverty alleviation have been the allure to my choice in studying Economics and my motivation to pursue my thesis in a subject that has been always closer to my heart. There is no consensus among economists, policy makers and political scientists as to how democratic properties of a regime in a country can bring a fast economic growth. But before the how, what is even democracy begs an answer. In my thesis I have tried to dig in to these broad conversation of definition of democracy. I discussed the concept of democracy the channels of growth that it can affect and then forwarded the empirical findings and arguments in the literature. Moreover, I have used in my empirical analysis fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), a rather fresh method of understanding causality and finding various paths to arrive at an outcome rather than solitary way propagated by other conventional methods. I included as many countries as possible so that many consistent paths of arriving at the outcome of development can be identified. The findings of my thesis indicate that one country can have a combination of different conditions in distinction to others, and achieve development.en
dc.ethesisid14116
dc.format.extent75
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.identifier.urihttps://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/18442
dc.identifier.urnURN:NBN:fi:aalto-201511055013
dc.language.isoenen
dc.locationP1 I
dc.programme.majorEconomicsen
dc.programme.majorKansantaloustiedefi
dc.subject.helecontaloustieteet
dc.subject.heleconeconomic science
dc.subject.helecontaloudellinen kehitys
dc.subject.heleconindustrial development
dc.subject.heleconpolitiikka
dc.subject.heleconpolitics
dc.subject.helecondemokratia
dc.subject.helecondemocracy
dc.subject.heleconyhteiskunta
dc.subject.heleconsociety
dc.subject.keyworddemocracy
dc.subject.keyworddevelopment
dc.subject.keywordfsqca
dc.subject.keywordqca
dc.subject.keywordcausality
dc.subject.keywordgrowth
dc.subject.keywordhuman development index
dc.subject.keyworddemokratia
dc.subject.keywordqualitative
dc.subject.keywordcomparative
dc.subject.keywordanalysis
dc.subject.keywordpolity iv
dc.titleDemocracy and Development: causality analysis using fsQCAen
dc.typeG2 Pro gradu, diplomityöfi
dc.type.dcmitypetexten
dc.type.ontasotMaster's thesisen
dc.type.ontasotPro gradu tutkielmafi
local.aalto.idthes14116
local.aalto.openaccessyes
Files
Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
hse_ethesis_14116.pdf
Size:
2.97 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format