aalto1 untyped-item.component.html

Text analysis in adversarial settings: Does deception leave a stylistic trace?

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Access rights

openAccess
acceptedVersion

URL

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

A2 Katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä

Major/Subject

Mcode

Degree programme

Language

en

Pages

Series

ACM Computing Surveys, Volume 52, issue 3, pp. 1-36

Abstract

Textual deception constitutes a major problem for online security. Many studies have argued that deceptiveness leaves traces in writing style, which could be detected using text classification techniques. By conducting an extensive literature review of existing empirical work, we demonstrate that while certain linguistic features have been indicative of deception in certain corpora, they fail to generalize across divergent semantic domains. We suggest that deceptiveness as such leaves no content-invariant stylistic trace, and textual similarity measures provide a superior means of classifying texts as potentially deceptive. Additionally, we discuss forms of deception beyond semantic content, focusing on hiding author identity by writing style obfuscation. Surveying the literature on both author identification and obfuscation techniques, we conclude that current style transformation methods fail to achieve reliable obfuscation while simultaneously ensuring semantic faithfulness to the original text. We propose that future work in style transformation should pay particular attention to disallowing semantically drastic changes.

Description

Other note

Citation

Gröndahl, T & Asokan, N 2019, 'Text analysis in adversarial settings : Does deception leave a stylistic trace?', ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 52, no. 3, 45, pp. 1-36. https://doi.org/10.1145/3310331

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By