Does the stock market fully value intangibles? - Brands and global equity prices

 |  Login

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Aalto University en
dc.contributor Aalto-yliopisto fi
dc.contributor.author Vesanen, Virva
dc.date.accessioned 2011-11-14T11:24:07Z
dc.date.available 2011-11-14T11:24:07Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.uri https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/743
dc.description.abstract PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of the study is to examine the relationship between brands and stock returns. I study the historical stock performance of global brand stocks, and test whether strong brands outperform the market index. A company is considered a brand stock if it is included in the annually published Interbrand Global Top 100 Brands ranking list. I also investigate whether numeric brand values assigned by Interbrand have an effect on the brand portfolio return. DATA The data set consists of all the publicly listed brand owner firms included in the Interbrand Global Top 100 Brands ranking list during 2001-2009. The monthly returns are calculated for a market value-, equal- and brand value-weighted global brand portfolio and analyzed statistically with the CAPM and Fama-French three factor model. The sample is then split into North America, Europe and Asia portfolios to uncover geographical performance differences. RESULTS The results suggest that brand stocks behave differently in North America than in Europe and Asia. The North America brand portfolio generates a significantly positive risk-adjusted alpha, which holds for different portfolio weighting methods and controlling for outliers. This result is in line with prior research results. However, results for the Europe and Asia portfolios lack significance and no evidence for outperformance is found. In addition, I find that brand value-weighting does not enhance excess returns, but on the contrary, diminishes the alpha. Findings suggest that numeric brand values may not be accurate after all, and that the stock market seems to assimilate brands better in Europe and Asia than in North America. Thus, future research should address the reasons causing excess returns of American brands. KEYWORDS: Brand, brand value, brand ranking list, brand stocks, intangible assets, global equity prices, excess returns en
dc.format.extent 97
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.title Does the stock market fully value intangibles? - Brands and global equity prices en
dc.type G2 Pro gradu, diplomityö fi
dc.contributor.school Kauppakorkeakoulu fi
dc.contributor.school School of Economics en
dc.contributor.department Department of Finance en
dc.contributor.department Rahoituksen laitos fi
dc.subject.keyword brands
dc.subject.keyword brand value
dc.subject.keyword brand ranking list
dc.subject.keyword brand stocks
dc.subject.keyword intangible assets
dc.subject.keyword global equity prices
dc.subject.keyword excess returns
dc.identifier.urn URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201111181655
dc.type.dcmitype text en
dc.programme.major Finance en
dc.programme.major Rahoitus fi
dc.type.ontasot Master's thesis en
dc.type.ontasot Pro gradu tutkielma fi
dc.subject.helecon rahoitus
dc.subject.helecon financing
dc.subject.helecon osakemarkkinat
dc.subject.helecon stock markets
dc.subject.helecon brandit
dc.subject.helecon brands
dc.subject.helecon yrityksen arvo
dc.subject.helecon company valuation
dc.subject.helecon aineeton omaisuus
dc.subject.helecon immaterial property
dc.ethesisid 12611
dc.date.dateaccepted 2011-09-06
dc.location P1 I


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search archive


Advanced Search

article-iconSubmit a publication

Browse

My Account