Microenterprises and new knowledge are regarded as important growth drivers today. The objective of
the thesis is to consider whether the existing theories take the microenterprises and new knowledge
into account in the assumptions and in the models themselves. The traditional neoclassical growth
theory by Solow and the more modern one, the endogenous growth theory are chosen as the theories
to begin with. It is noticed that neither of the theories take into account the growth drivers proposed by
literature and empirical research. As a result, the modified endogenous growth theory, the endogenous
growth theory of entrepreneurship is introduced and discussed in detail.
The endogenous growth theory of entrepreneurship assumes that as a consequence of new, spilled over
knowledge, entrepreneurial opportunities are created. Thus the model makes the important
assumptions that new knowledge needs a mechanism by which it transforms into opportunities,
commercialized products and ultimately into profits and economic growth. The mechanism is a new
enterprise.
However the endogenous growth theory of entrepreneurship depicts the real growth factors better than
its predecessors, the assumption underlying the model that microenterprises are the growth factor
brings new deficiencies. The model does not take into account the decision of becoming an
entrepreneur and the factors affecting that decision. The most important deficiency is that the financial
situation is extremely difficult for microenterprises. The traditional lending institutions, banks, and the
formal venture capitalists refuse to lend capital to such high risk ventures. As the thesis proposes,
business angels are usually the only option for the microenterprises to receive investment capital that
they need for growth. It could be advantageous for the endogenous growth theory of entrepreneurship
to take into account also the financial situation of the microenterprises since it affects the
establishment, success, growth and disappearance of such enterprises.
The thesis proposes that informal venture capitalists are the main source of financing for
microenterprises and that the venture capital markets are inefficient since demand exceeds supply
clearly. Actually, the findings are so convincing that the thesis proposes that often without business
angel capital, microenterprises cannot grow and thus much growth potential also at the economy level
is wasted. Business angels clearly contribute to economic growth.
The final objective is to propose that the hands-on involvement of business angels actually enhances the
growth rates of the investee microenterprises. The source of the value added is the business angels’
accumulated human and social capital. By participating with the investee enterprise, business angels
perform particular value adding roles which increase the firm growth rate even more. The basis for the
argumentation is on the notion that the new entrepreneurs lack all kinds of economical skills; financial,
sales and marketing, management, strategic viewpoints as well important networks, among others.