Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate

Bengs, Christer

Aaltodoc
→
6b Artikkelit / Articles from Research information portal
→
[article-cris] Insinööritieteiden korkeakoulu / ENG
→
View Item

Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate

Altmetrics



Title:	Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate
Author(s):	Bengs, Christer
Date:	2016
Language:	en
Pages:	7 561-567
Department:	Department of Built Environment
Series:	2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020), Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 223
ISSN:	1877-0428
DOI-number:	10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344
Keywords:	Heritage, evaluation, expertise, NATIONAL CULTURE
» Show full item record
This publication is imported from Aalto University Research information portal: https://research.aalto.fi > View this publication in Research information portal > View/Open full text file from Research information portal
Citation: Bengs , C 2016 , Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate . in F Calabro & L DellaSpina (eds) , 2ND INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM NEW METROPOLITAN PERSPECTIVES - STRATEGIC PLANNING, SPATIAL PLANNING, ECONOMIC PROGRAMS AND DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS, THROUGH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF HORIZON/EUROPE2020, (ISTH2020) . Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences , vol. 223 , Elsevier , pp. 561-567 , International Symposium on New Metropolitan Perspectives , Reggio Calabria , Italy , 18/05/2016 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.344
Abstract: International documents and charters list matters to be considered when protecting built environment, but they do not tell how to evaluate them. Here, a model for evaluation is presented based on a complex and dynamic understanding of value. This model is concerted with a model for distribution of heritage goods according to kind of market. The idea of evaluators as experts is criticised as evaluation is always a unique and individual act. Only knowledge about criteria used in evaluation, not evaluating as such, can be accumulated and thereby professionalised. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Permanent link to this item: http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201711217617 Email this Export to RefWorks QR Code Print BibTex Tweet