Metacognition of visual short-term memory: Dissociation between objective and subjective components of VSTM

 |  Login

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Aalto-yliopisto fi
dc.contributor Aalto University en Bona, S. Cattaneo, Z. Vecchi, T. Soto, D. Silvanto, J. 2017-05-11T06:48:26Z 2017-05-11T06:48:26Z 2013
dc.identifier.citation Bona , S , Cattaneo , Z , Vecchi , T , Soto , D & Silvanto , J 2013 , ' Metacognition of visual short-term memory: Dissociation between objective and subjective components of VSTM ' FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY , vol 4 , 62 , pp. 1-6 . DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00062 en
dc.identifier.issn 1664-1078
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: 22397e50-76c1-439a-b882-01321e9580b6
dc.identifier.other PURE ITEMURL:
dc.identifier.other PURE FILEURL:
dc.description.abstract The relationship between the objective accuracy of visual short-term memory (VSTM) representations and their subjective conscious experience is unknown. We investigated this issue by assessing how the objective and subjective components of VSTM in a delayed cue-target orientation discrimination task are affected by intervening distracters. On each trial, participants were shown a memory cue (a grating), the orientation of which they were asked to hold in memory. On approximately half of the trials, a distracter grating appeared during the maintenance interval; its orientation was either identical to that of the memory cue, or it differed by 10° or 40°. The distracters were masked and presented briefly, so they were only consciously perceived on a subset of trials. At the end of the delay period, a memory test probe was presented, and participants were asked to indicate whether it was tilted to the left or right relative to the memory cue (VSTM accuracy; objective performance). In order to assess subjective metacognition, participants were asked indicate the vividness of their memory for the original memory cue. Finally, participants were asked rate their awareness of the distracter. Results showed that objective VSTM performance was impaired by distracters only when the distracters were very different from the cue, and that this occurred with both subjectively visible and invisible distracters. Subjective metacognition, however, was impaired by distracters of all orientations, but only when these distracters were subjectively invisible. Our results thus indicate that the objective and subjective components of VSTM are to some extent dissociable. en
dc.format.extent 1-6
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en en
dc.relation.ispartofseries FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Volume 4 en
dc.rights openAccess en
dc.subject.other 114 Physical sciences en
dc.subject.other 221 Nanotechnology en
dc.subject.other 214 Mechanical engineering en
dc.subject.other 218 Environmental engineering en
dc.title Metacognition of visual short-term memory: Dissociation between objective and subjective components of VSTM en
dc.type A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä fi
dc.description.version Peer reviewed en
dc.contributor.department Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering en
dc.subject.keyword visual short-term memory
dc.subject.keyword visual awareness
dc.subject.keyword visual processing
dc.subject.keyword memory vividness
dc.subject.keyword distracter interference
dc.subject.keyword 114 Physical sciences
dc.subject.keyword 221 Nanotechnology
dc.subject.keyword 214 Mechanical engineering
dc.subject.keyword 218 Environmental engineering
dc.identifier.urn URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201705113846
dc.identifier.doi 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00062
dc.type.version publishedVersion

Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search archive

Advanced Search

article-iconSubmit a publication


My Account