Title: | Making sustainability : how Fab Labs address environmental issues |
Author(s): | Kohtala, Cindy |
Date: | 2016 |
Language: | en |
Pages: | 125 |
Department: | Muotoilun laitos Department of Design |
ISBN: | 978-952-60-6662-2 (electronic) 978-952-60-6661-5 (printed) |
Series: | Aalto University publication series DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS, 29/2016 |
ISSN: | 1799-4942 (electronic) 1799-4934 (printed) 1799-4934 (ISSN-L) |
Supervising professor(s): | Hyysalo, Sampsa, Prof., Aalto University, School of Arts, Design, and Architecture, Finland |
Thesis advisor(s): | Hyysalo, Sampsa, Prof., Aalto University, School of Arts, Design, and Architecture, Finland |
Subject: | Environmental science, Mechanical engineering |
Keywords: | Fab Labs, environmental sustainability, digital fabrication, distributed production, peer production |
|
|
Abstract:Digital manufacturing technologies are proliferating and can enable socially significant, innovative new forms of production and consumption. This thesis examines the environmental sustainability issues in peer production and how they are addressed in Fab Labs (fabrication laboratories): shared spaces where users can design and make their own artefacts outside of conventional mass production channels, using, for example, laser cutters, 3D printers and electronics stations. Fab Labs are open to members of the general public, who learn to use the equipment themselves and are encouraged (or required) to document and openly share their projects. ‘Making’ in Fab Labs and the ‘maker movement’ are often endorsed by proponents as a better alternative to mass consumption and consumerism, whether through enhancing skills to build and repair, answering one’s own needs as opposed to ‘satisficing’ through passive consumption, or distributing production within local networks as opposed to long, transport-intensive and large-volume supply chains. However, Fab Labs and makerspaces are contexts rife with paradox and complexity concerning appropriate use of materials and energy. Little empirical research on material peer production currently exists, and the environmental impacts, and benefits, of digital fabrication are largely unknown.
|
|
Parts:[Publication 1]: Kohtala, C., 2015. Addressing sustainability in research on distributed production: an integrated literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production 106, 654-668. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.039 (Full text is included in the PDF file of the dissertation.) View at Publisher [Publication 2]: Kohtala, C., Hyysalo, S., 2015. Anticipated environmental sustainability of personal fabrication. Journal of Cleaner Production 99, 333–344. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.093 (Full text is included in the PDF file of the dissertation.) View at Publisher [Publication 3]: Kohtala, C., Bosqué, C., 2014. The Story of MIT-Fablab Norway: Community Embedding of Peer Production. Journal of Peer Production 5. http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/peerreviewed- articles/the-story-of-mit-fablab-norway-community-embeddingof-peer-production/ (Full text is included in the PDF file of the dissertation.)[Publication 4]: Kohtala, C. Making ‘Making’ Critical: How Sustainability is Constituted in Fab Lab Ideology. Unpublished, in review. (Full text is included in the PDF file of the dissertation.) |
|
|
Unless otherwise stated, all rights belong to the author. You may download, display and print this publication for Your own personal use. Commercial use is prohibited.
Page content by: Aalto University Learning Centre | Privacy policy of the service | About this site