IPO valuation using peer multiples - Evidence of overvaluation from Europe 1990-2008

 |  Login

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Aalto-yliopisto fi
dc.contributor Aalto University en
dc.contributor.author Pöyhönen, Santtu Mikael
dc.date.accessioned 2016-08-16T11:35:41Z
dc.date.available 2016-08-16T11:35:41Z
dc.date.issued 2009
dc.identifier.uri https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/21274
dc.description.abstract PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study is to analyze the valuation of European initial public offerings (IPOs) relative to peer group of comparable firms by using price-to-value (P/V) multiples. Furthermore, the intention of this thesis is to study underpricing, short-run abnormal returns, and long-run underperformance in price-to-value valuation context. The objective of the study is threefold. First, I empirically test whether the European initial public offerings are overvalued in relation to their listed peer companies by using various price multiples. Secondly, I examine the relationship between IPO underpricing and valuation results. Lastly, I study possible differences in short- and long-run abnormal returns between under- and overvalued IPOs. DATA The initial listing data for European IPOs is gathered from the Thomson Financial SDC Global New Issues database, and it has been completed with the financial and secondary market data from the Thomson ONE-banker and DataStream databases. The financial and aftermarket data for peer companies is solely retrieved from the Thomson ONE-banker. After all the limitations, my final sample consists of 614 European IPOs from the time period of 1.1.1990-31.12.2008. RESULTS My results indicate that European IPOs are systematically overvalued by 60% relative to their industry peers, and the overpricing is significantly highest by about 150% during the “dot-com” boom in years 1999-2000. The results also suggest that investors pay too much information to optimistic growth forecasts and too little attention to current profitability in valuing IPOs which creates unique patterns in IPOs’ aftermarket returns. I find that overvalued IPOs earn 27% (p.a.) higher risk-adjusted abnormal returns than undervalued IPOs during the first six months but earn 40% to 110% lower buy-and-hold abnormal returns on a five-year time scale. en
dc.format.extent 85
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.title IPO valuation using peer multiples - Evidence of overvaluation from Europe 1990-2008 en
dc.type G2 Pro gradu, diplomityö fi
dc.contributor.school Kauppakorkeakoulu fi
dc.contributor.school School of Business en
dc.contributor.department Laskentatoimen ja rahoituksen laitos fi
dc.contributor.department Department of Accounting and Finance en
dc.subject.keyword initial public offering
dc.subject.keyword IPO
dc.subject.keyword behavioral finance
dc.subject.keyword investor sentiment
dc.subject.keyword overvaluation
dc.subject.keyword underpricing
dc.subject.keyword After-market performance
dc.subject.keyword Buy-and-hold abnormal return
dc.subject.keyword BHAR
dc.identifier.urn URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201609083488
dc.type.dcmitype text en
dc.programme.major Rahoitus fi
dc.programme.major Finance en
dc.type.ontasot Pro gradu tutkielma fi
dc.type.ontasot Master's thesis en
dc.subject.helecon rahoitus
dc.subject.helecon financing
dc.subject.helecon listautuminen
dc.subject.helecon listed companies
dc.subject.helecon yrityksen arvo
dc.subject.helecon company valuation
dc.subject.helecon tuotto
dc.subject.helecon rate of return
dc.ethesisid 14452
dc.date.dateaccepted 2009-09-08
dc.location P1 I

Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search archive

Advanced Search

article-iconSubmit a publication


My Account