Learning Centre

Life cycle impact assessment based on decision analysis

 |  Login

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Aalto-yliopisto fi
dc.contributor Aalto University en
dc.contributor.author Seppälä, Jyri
dc.date.accessioned 2012-02-10T08:53:55Z
dc.date.available 2012-02-10T08:53:55Z
dc.date.issued 2003-08-29
dc.identifier.isbn 951-22-6695-4
dc.identifier.issn 0782-2030
dc.identifier.uri https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/2104
dc.description.abstract Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a popular tool for evaluating environmental impacts of products and services. However, the methodological choices and framework to assess environmental impacts in LCA are still under discussion. Despite intensive development worldwide, few attempts have been made hitherto to systematically present the theoretical bases of life cycle impact assessment (LCIA). In this study, the decision analytic foundations for LCIA are illustrated. It is shown that the typical aggregation equation used in LCIA for calculating indicator results can be derived from multiattribute value theory (MAVT) if certain simple assumptions hold. The decision analysis framework presented in this work offers additional values for all the phases of LCIA. A value tree, a tool used for structuring multicriteria decision making problems, can be helpful for selection of impact categories and classification. MAVT can clarify the debate concerning marginal and average approaches in the determination of characterisation factors. On the basis of MAVT, normalisation is needed before weighting. The methods and experiences of preference elicitation derived from the field of decision analysis can be utilised in the determination of subjective characterisation factors and impact category weights. Furthermore, experiences and techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision models can be utilised in LCIA. In addition, MAVT assists in the calculation of impact category indicator results and total impact indicator results according to the appropriate aggregation equations. The decision analysis framework presented in this work is flexible and suitable for different impact assessment approaches developed in LCIA and it can help the methodological development with which the non-linearity aspects of impact assessment are taken into account. It is shown in the work that site-dependent characterisation methods can easily be fitted into the framework. In a case study of the Finnish forest industry a Finland-specific impact assessment model utilising the results of other tools, such as air quality and transport models and even expert judgements, was developed. In addition, the so-called ratio estimation method for the elicitation of impact category weights was applied and developed so that interval-valued ratio judgements could be used in the uncertainty analysis of the model. In the case of the Finnish metals industry, decision analysis impact assessment was applied to produce a solution in which global, regional and local environmental problems were assessed in the same framework. In both case studies, experts working with the environmental issues valuated impact category weights with the help of decision analysis techniques. In the work it was shown that MAVT provides a foundation for a logical and rational approach to impact assessment in LCA. In the future, there is a need to demonstrate quantitatively the differences between LCIA conducted according to MAVT and according to current practices. Furthermore, there is a need for research to study the strengths and weaknesses of the different decision analysis methods for LCIA purposes. en
dc.format.extent 63, [226]
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en en
dc.publisher Helsinki University of Technology en
dc.publisher Teknillinen korkeakoulu fi
dc.relation.ispartofseries Research reports / Helsinki University of Technology, Systems Analysis Laboratory. A en
dc.relation.ispartofseries 86 en
dc.relation.haspart Seppälä J., 1999. Decision analysis as a tool for life cycle impact assessment. In Klöpffer W. and Hutzinger O., LCA Documents 4. Eco-Informa Press, Bayreuth. Also published in The Finnish Environment 123. Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki.
dc.relation.haspart Seppälä J. and Hämäläinen R. P., 2001. On the meaning of the distance-to-target weighting method and normalisation in life cycle impact assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 6, No. 4, pages 211-218.
dc.relation.haspart Seppälä J., Koskela S., Melanen M. and Palperi M., 2002. The Finnish metals industry and the environment. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 35, pages 61-76.
dc.relation.haspart Seppälä J., Basson L. and Norris G. A., 2002. Decision analysis frameworks for life-cycle impact assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology 5, No. 4, pages 45-68.
dc.subject.other Environmental science en
dc.title Life cycle impact assessment based on decision analysis en
dc.type G5 Artikkeliväitöskirja fi
dc.description.version reviewed en
dc.contributor.department Department of Engineering Physics and Mathematics en
dc.contributor.department Teknillisen fysiikan ja matematiikan osasto fi
dc.subject.keyword life cycle impact assessment en
dc.subject.keyword LCA en
dc.subject.keyword decision analysis en
dc.subject.keyword valuation en
dc.subject.keyword environmental impact assessment en
dc.subject.keyword forest industry en
dc.subject.keyword metals industry en
dc.subject.keyword models en
dc.subject.keyword theories en
dc.identifier.urn urn:nbn:fi:tkk-000720
dc.type.dcmitype text en
dc.type.ontasot Väitöskirja (artikkeli) fi
dc.type.ontasot Doctoral dissertation (article-based) en
dc.contributor.lab Systems Analysis Laboratory en
dc.contributor.lab Systeemianalyysin laboratorio fi


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search archive


Advanced Search

article-iconSubmit a publication

Browse