Are target fund shareholders really the winners in mutual fund mergers?

 |  Login

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Aalto-yliopisto fi
dc.contributor Aalto University en
dc.contributor.author Lapatto, Anni
dc.date.accessioned 2015-12-16T08:18:01Z
dc.date.available 2015-12-16T08:18:01Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.uri https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/19267
dc.description.abstract OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY: In my thesis, I study how the target portfolios in mutual fund mergers would have performed compared to the portfolios acquiring them if they had not been merged but continued on their own, target portfolios having a buy-and-hold strategy based on their latest holdings. In other words, I compare the simulated target portfolio returns to the realized acquiring portfolio re-turns in the post-merger period. DATA AND METHODOLOGY: My sample consists of 264 individual merging portfolio pairs from January 2007 to June 2012 and includes mutual fund portfolios investing into US equity products. I compare both raw returns and risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio) on annual basis. All the data is retrieved from CRSP and is free from survivorship bias. For return comparison in the research period I employ Wilcoxon signed rank test and check the robustness of the results with Student's t-test. FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: In the pre-merger period, acquiring portfolios outperform target portfolios. The median paired annual return difference is 1.40% (0.23) two years prior to the merger, and 1.43% (0.23) a year prior to the merger in favour of acquiring portfolios. In the post-merger period, the pattern is reversed as target portfolios have superior performance compared to acquiring portfolios. In the first year after the merger, target portfolios have on median 1.45% (0.13) higher annual returns than their acquiring portfolios, and in the second year the median paired annual return difference has increased to 2.57% (0.49). The superior post-merger performance of target portfolios can be explained by mean reversion taking place from continuity in the underlying holdings sooner than expected and the passive buy-and-hold strategy of target portfolios outperforming the active management of acquiring portfolios. en
dc.format.extent 61
dc.language.iso en en
dc.title Are target fund shareholders really the winners in mutual fund mergers? en
dc.type G2 Pro gradu, diplomityö fi
dc.contributor.school Kauppakorkeakoulu fi
dc.contributor.school School of Business en
dc.contributor.department Rahoituksen laitos fi
dc.contributor.department Department of Finance en
dc.subject.keyword mutual fund
dc.subject.keyword mutual fund merger
dc.subject.keyword shareholder wealth effect
dc.subject.keyword return simulation
dc.identifier.urn URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201512165785
dc.type.dcmitype text en
dc.programme.major Finance en
dc.programme.major Rahoitus fi
dc.type.ontasot Master's thesis en
dc.type.ontasot Pro gradu tutkielma fi
dc.subject.helecon rahoitus
dc.subject.helecon financing
dc.subject.helecon sijoitusrahastot
dc.subject.helecon investment funds
dc.subject.helecon fuusiot
dc.subject.helecon mergers
dc.subject.helecon tuotto
dc.subject.helecon rate of return
dc.ethesisid 14166
dc.date.dateaccepted 2015-09-10
dc.location P1 I


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search archive


Advanced Search

article-iconSubmit a publication

Browse

My Account