Voluntary audit, earnings quality, and the cost of debt: Evidence from small Finnish companies exempt from mandatory audit since 2007

 |  Login

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Aalto-yliopisto fi
dc.contributor Aalto University en
dc.contributor.author Saukola, Heikki
dc.date.accessioned 2015-11-04T13:21:20Z
dc.date.available 2015-11-04T13:21:20Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.uri https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/18439
dc.description.abstract PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of voluntary audit on the earnings quality of small Finnish firms which qualified for audit exemption when the new Finnish Auditing Act entered into force in 2007. The study also aims to examine the effects of voluntary audit and earnings quality on the cost of debt of these small Finnish firms. The study contributes to the ongoing discussion on voluntary small company audits. DATA AND METHODOLOGY: The full sample used in the study contains 8,816 small Finnish companies which were exempt from statutory audit in 2008 (3,016 of which were voluntarily audited and 5,800 not audited then). Difference-in-differences models are used in estimating the effect of auditing on earnings quality and cost of debt utilizing the full sample. Propensity score matching is used as an alternative method in estimating the same effects, utilizing a balanced sample of 2,866 matched pairs of companies. The relation between earnings quality and cost of debt is analyzed by calculating the mean cost of debt for each quintile of ranked earnings quality measure distributions. The study employs a broad definition of earnings quality, whereby it is conditional on the decision-relevance of information provided by earnings and hence defined in the context of a specific decision model. Given that no single earnings quality measure is best for all decision models, several earnings quality proxies are used in this study. These include various measures utilizing accruals and residuals from a cross-sectional abnormal accruals model, a measure of timely loss recognition, and a metric of value relevance. RESULTS: Overall, the results suggest that not being audited has a negative (or being audited equivalently positive) impact on earnings quality as evaluated by several earnings quality measures. Strong evidence was found suggesting that poorer earnings quality is associated with higher cost of debt, while no evidence was found on the impact of auditing on the cost of debt. en
dc.format.extent 74
dc.language.iso en en
dc.title Voluntary audit, earnings quality, and the cost of debt: Evidence from small Finnish companies exempt from mandatory audit since 2007 en
dc.type G2 Pro gradu, diplomityö fi
dc.contributor.school Kauppakorkeakoulu fi
dc.contributor.school School of Business en
dc.contributor.department Laskentatoimen laitos fi
dc.contributor.department Department of Accounting en
dc.subject.keyword earnings quality
dc.subject.keyword earnings management
dc.subject.keyword abnormal accruals
dc.subject.keyword small companies
dc.subject.keyword voluntary audit
dc.identifier.urn URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201511055010
dc.type.dcmitype text en
dc.programme.major Accounting en
dc.programme.major Laskentatoimi fi
dc.type.ontasot Master's thesis en
dc.type.ontasot Pro gradu tutkielma fi
dc.subject.helecon laskentatoimi
dc.subject.helecon accounting
dc.subject.helecon tilintarkastus
dc.subject.helecon auditing
dc.subject.helecon pienyritykset
dc.subject.helecon small businesses
dc.subject.helecon tulos
dc.subject.helecon return
dc.subject.helecon laatu
dc.subject.helecon quality
dc.subject.helecon pääoma
dc.subject.helecon capital
dc.subject.helecon kustannukset
dc.subject.helecon costs
dc.ethesisid 14113
dc.date.dateaccepted 2015-02-10
dc.location P1 I


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search archive


Advanced Search

article-iconSubmit a publication

Browse

My Account