Learning Centre

Effect of different distance measures in result of cluster analysis

 |  Login

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Aalto-yliopisto fi
dc.contributor Aalto University en
dc.contributor.advisor Nikander, Jussi
dc.contributor.author Dahal, Sujan
dc.date.accessioned 2015-09-18T08:47:16Z
dc.date.available 2015-09-18T08:47:16Z
dc.date.issued 2015-08-24
dc.identifier.uri https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/17787
dc.description.abstract The objective of this master’s thesis was to explore different distance measures that could be used in clustering and to evaluate how different distance measures in K-medoid clustering method would affect the clustering output. The different distance measures used in this research includes Euclidean, Squared Euclidean, Manhattan, Chebyshev and Mahalanobis distance. To achieve the research objective, K-medoid method with different distance measures was applied to a spatial dataset to explore relative information revealed by each distance measure. The effect of each distance measure on output is documented and the output was further compared with each other to reveal the differences between each distance measure. The study starts with literature review of cluster analysis process where necessary steps for performing cluster analysis are explained. In literature section, different clustering methods with particular characteristics of each method are described that would serve as basis for choice of clustering method. Data description and data analysis is included thereafter which is followed by interpretation of clustering result and its use for Terrain analysis. Terrain analysis has its significance in forest industry, military as well as crisis management and is usually concerned with off-road mobility of a vehicle or a group of vehicles between given locations. In case of terrain analysis, clustering could be used to group the similar areas and determine the off-road mobility of a particular vehicle. This result could be further categorized according to suitability of the item in the cluster and interpreted using expert evaluation in order to reveal useful information about mobility in a terrain. Cluster Validation measures were applied to output of clustering to determine the differences between different distance measures. The findings of this study indicate that in the study area, there exists some level of differences in the result of clustering when different distance measures are used. This difference is then interpreted with the help of input dataset and expert opinion to understand the effect of different distance measures in the dataset. Finally, the study provides basis for mobility analysis with help of clustering output. en
dc.format.extent 77+3
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso en en
dc.title Effect of different distance measures in result of cluster analysis en
dc.type G2 Pro gradu, diplomityö en
dc.contributor.school Insinööritieteiden korkeakoulu fi
dc.subject.keyword cluster analysis en
dc.subject.keyword distance measures en
dc.subject.keyword K-medoid clustering en
dc.subject.keyword terrain analysis en
dc.identifier.urn URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201509184402
dc.programme.major Geoinformatics fi
dc.programme.mcode M3002 fi
dc.type.ontasot Master's thesis en
dc.type.ontasot Diplomityö fi
dc.contributor.supervisor Virrantaus, Kirsi-Kanerva
dc.programme Master’s Programme in Geomatics fi
local.aalto.openaccess yes
dc.rights.accesslevel openAccess
local.aalto.idinssi 52119
dc.type.publication masterThesis
dc.type.okm G2 Pro gradu, diplomityö


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search archive


Advanced Search

article-iconSubmit a publication

Browse