The impact of government ownership in mergers and acquisitions

No Thumbnail Available
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
School of Economics | Master's thesis
Ask about the availability of the thesis by sending email to the Aalto University Learning Centre oppimiskeskus@aalto.fi
Date
2008
Major/Subject
Finance
Rahoitus
Mcode
Degree programme
Language
en
Pages
74
Series
Abstract
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The purpose of this study is to evaluate the change in shareholder value when privatized companies conduct mergers and acquisitions. I calculate the cumulative abnormal return for the acquirer, target and the combined entity around the takeover announcement date. In addition, I construct regression models to quantify the company and deal specific issues that affect the cumulative abnormal returns. In order to compare the activities of the privatized companies, I construct a control group to which I compare the results. DATA The information about the privatized companies has been obtained from the Helsinki School of Economics’ Finance Department, this dataset includes 248 companies. In addition, I have collected the historical ownership data manually for all these companies. The control group consists of 248 largest companies in the Dow Jones STOXX Global 1800 –index, excluding any overlapping companies with the main sample. The mergers and acquisition data is from SDC and share price data from Thomson Datastream. RESULTS My findings show that the cumulative abnormal return for acquirer in both samples, SIP and control sample, is negative around a takeover announcement date. In addition, I find evidence of target run-up and show that the takeovers create value for the combined entity. I also show that the government’s ownership stake does not statistically significantly affect to the cumulative abnormal returns the acquiring companies, that are partly owned by the state, experience. In addition, I show that the privatized companies make statistically significantly more cross border deals than companies in the control sample. The takeovers are also smaller and attract less interest from multiple bidders. The takeovers in both samples are motivated by synergy and hubris.
Description
Keywords
merger, acquisition, privatization
Other note
Citation