Objectives of the study
The objective of the study is to provide further evidence on the short- and long-term performance
of IPOs backed by either a private equity (PE) or a venture capital (VC) sponsor. Private equity has
been a growing asset class in the past decade and academia has provided increased attention to the
IPOs backed by a financial sponsor. The past results seem to be pointing towards less underpricing
and less underperformance of sponsored IPOs (especially PE ones), however the results are
somewhat inconclusive. Thus, my thesis is broadening the evidence of sponsored IPOs and
increasing the scarce Nordic evidence. Nordics provide an interesting sample of sponsored IPOs as
the financial sponsor sector is rather closed, less developed but increasingly active.
Data
The dataset includes IPOs from the Nordics through a 20-year timespan from January 2000 to
December 2019. Nordics include Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden and both the main
markets as well as alternative exchanges such as First North Growth Market and Oslo Stock
Exchange. Total number of IPOs included in the analysis is 483 of which 58 are PE backed, 36 VC
backed and 389 are nonsponsored. Abnormal initial return is used in estimating the underpricing
of IPOs. For long-term performance, Buy-and-Hold Abnormal Return (BHAR) is used for each of
the samples.
Results
The results do not provide evidence on certification effect nor that the sponsored IPOs would be
less underpriced compared to nonsponsored IPOs. Some indication of the opposing effect that the
sponsored IPOs would be more underpriced is prevailing, but these results are not statistically
significant. In the long-term the results indicate that venture capital backed IPOs would be
underperforming both the market, and their nonsponsored counterparts. On the contrary, results
suggest that private equity backed IPOs would be outperforming the market. The performance of
PE backed IPOs is also in par, or better compared to the nonsponsored IPOs, which provide
indication that PE backed IPOs would outperform their nonsponsored counterparts in the longterm. These results are also statistically significant.