Erilaistuminen vai samanlaistuminen? : vertaileva tutkimus paperiteollisuusyhtiöiden ympäristöjohtamisesta

 |  Login

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Aalto-yliopisto fi
dc.contributor Aalto University en
dc.contributor.author Kuisma, Mika
dc.date.accessioned 2013-10-31T09:41:11Z
dc.date.available 2013-10-31T09:41:11Z
dc.date.issued 2004
dc.identifier.isbn 951-791-835-6
dc.identifier.issn 1237-556X
dc.identifier.uri https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/11212
dc.description.abstract Previous management literature has recognised the contradictions between institutional and competitive pressures for individual firms. The institutional perspective emphasises similarities between firms and the tendencies of firms to become similar to each other to secure legitimacy. The competitive perspective emphasises the importance of genuine strategies and practices to secure competitiveness. In practice, however, firms must simultaneously secure competitiveness by being sufficiently different from their competitors, and legitimacy by being sufficiently similar to others in the industry. In this study, the contradictions between competitive and institutional pressures and their influence on the organisation and management of companies were studied in the context of the international pulp and paper industry. The focus of the empirical study was on the environmental management of pulp and paper companies. The environmental management of the companies was analysed on three levels: environmental performance (emissions and the use of resources), environmental policies (e.g. certificates) and environmental legitimacy (the environmental image of the companies). The findings of the study indicate that the overall environmental performance of the companies analysed improved during the late 1990s. However, in some cases, decoupling between formal environmental policies and actual environmental performance exist. The facade of the company looked better than the reality, i.e. the environmental facts behind it. By being active at the policy level, firms may partly contribute to the obtaining of positive media coverage, thus enhancing their legitimacy. The environmental institutional legitimacy of firms largely coincides with the activity of firms in the adoption of formal environmental policies en
dc.format.extent 168, [27] s.
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf en
dc.language.iso fi en
dc.publisher Helsinki School of Economics en
dc.publisher Helsingin kauppakorkeakoulu fi
dc.relation.ispartofseries Acta Universitatis oeconomicae Helsingiensis. A fi
dc.relation.ispartofseries 232 fi
dc.title Erilaistuminen vai samanlaistuminen? : vertaileva tutkimus paperiteollisuusyhtiöiden ympäristöjohtamisesta fi
dc.type G4 Monografiaväitöskirja fi
dc.contributor.school Kauppakorkeakoulu fi
dc.contributor.school School of Business en
dc.identifier.urn URN:ISBN:951-791-835-6
dc.type.dcmitype text en
dc.programme.major Organisaatiot ja johtaminen fi
dc.programme.major Organization and Management en
dc.type.ontasot Väitöskirja (monografia) fi
dc.type.ontasot Doctoral dissertation (monograph) en
dc.contributor.supervisor Lovio, Raimo, professor
dc.opn Hukkinen, Janne, professor, Helsinki University of Technology, Finland
dc.subject.helecon Metsäteollisuus
dc.subject.helecon Paperiteollisuus
dc.subject.helecon Ympäristöjohtaminen
dc.subject.helecon Forestry industry
dc.subject.helecon Paper industry
dc.subject.helecon Environmental management
dc.date.defence 2004-04-16
dc.dissid 255
dc.identifier.bibid 303689


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search archive


Advanced Search

article-iconSubmit a publication

Browse

My Account