Learning Centre

Tennis Stroke Classification: Comparing Wrist and Racket as IMU Sensor Position

 |  Login

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Aalto-yliopisto fi
dc.contributor Aalto University en
dc.contributor.author Findling, Rainhard
dc.contributor.author Ebner, Christopher J.
dc.date.accessioned 2021-03-22T07:12:08Z
dc.date.available 2021-03-22T07:12:08Z
dc.date.issued 2019-12
dc.identifier.citation Findling , R & Ebner , C J 2019 , Tennis Stroke Classification: Comparing Wrist and Racket as IMU Sensor Position . in 17th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia (MoMM2019) . ACM , pp. 74–83 , International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia , Munich , Germany , 02/12/2019 . https://doi.org/10.1145/3365921.3365929 en
dc.identifier.isbn 978-1-4503-7178-0
dc.identifier.other PURE UUID: cc1d4da3-f508-45fb-b732-e59a9f44acb1
dc.identifier.other PURE ITEMURL: https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/cc1d4da3-f508-45fb-b732-e59a9f44acb1
dc.identifier.other PURE FILEURL: https://research.aalto.fi/files/37133508/ELEC_Ebner_Tennis_Stroke_Recognition_MoMM2019.pdf
dc.identifier.uri https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/103287
dc.description.abstract Automatic tennis stroke recognition can help tennis players improve their training experience. Previous work has used sensors positions on both wrist and tennis racket, of which different physiological aspects bring different sensing capabilities. However, no comparison of the performance of both positions has been done yet. In this paper we comparatively assess wrist and racket sensor positions for tennis stroke detection and classification. We investigate detection and classification rates with 8 well-known stroke types and visualize their differences in 3D acceleration and angular velocity. Our stroke detection utilizes a peak detection with thresholding and windowing on the derivative of sensed acceleration, while for our stroke recognition we evaluate different feature sets and classification models. Despite the different physiological aspects of wrist and racket as sensor position, for a controlled environment results indicate similar performance in both stroke detection (98.5%-99.5%) and user-dependentand independent classification (89%-99%). en
dc.format.extent 10
dc.format.extent 74–83
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en en
dc.relation.ispartof International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing and Multimedia en
dc.relation.ispartofseries 17th International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia (MoMM2019) en
dc.rights openAccess en
dc.title Tennis Stroke Classification: Comparing Wrist and Racket as IMU Sensor Position en
dc.type A4 Artikkeli konferenssijulkaisussa fi
dc.description.version Peer reviewed en
dc.contributor.department Ambient Intelligence
dc.contributor.department University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria
dc.contributor.department Department of Communications and Networking en
dc.subject.keyword machine learning
dc.subject.keyword tennis stroke detection
dc.subject.keyword tennis stroke recognition
dc.subject.keyword wearable sensors
dc.identifier.urn URN:NBN:fi:aalto-202103222565
dc.identifier.doi 10.1145/3365921.3365929
dc.type.version acceptedVersion


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no open access files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search archive


Advanced Search

article-iconSubmit a publication

Browse

Statistics