Relative performance evaluation in performance share plans: Evidence from Finland

 |  Login

Show simple item record

dc.contributor Aalto University en
dc.contributor Aalto-yliopisto fi
dc.contributor.author Rokkonen, Mira Marjut Elina
dc.date.accessioned 2013-06-25T07:15:59Z
dc.date.available 2013-06-25T07:15:59Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.uri https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/10299
dc.description.abstract Regardless of the strong theoretical justification for the use of relative performance evaluation in setting executive compensation, previous empirical results supporting relative performance evaluation are mixed. This study contributes to the existing literature by analyzing implicit relative performance evaluation in a specific form of compensation, performance share plans. Implicit relative performance evaluation is studied with the single-year relative performance evaluation model used also in the previous research, in addition to which an adjusted long-term relative performance evaluation model is developed to account for longer term (3-year) performance and to extend the analysis also to other executives besides the chief executive officer (CEO). The proprietary and unique data cover all the performance share plans ever used (per August 2012) in Finnish companies listed on the Nasdaq OMX Helsinki stock exchange. A total of 87 companies and 543 share plan lots are included in the initial sample. The sample for the adjusted long-term relative performance evaluation analysis consists of 53 companies and 179 performance share plan lots. The sample for the single-year relative performance evaluation analysis includes a total of 167 performance share plan lots in 42 companies which correspond to 125 single-year changes. The data include observations from year 2000 to August 2012. Although the Finnish companies do not usually use explicit relative performance evaluation in their performance share plans, the empirical evidence presented in this study indicates that companies use short-term as well as long-term implicit relative performance evaluation with respect to total shareholder returns in their performance share plans. Furthermore, CEO performance is more likely to be evaluated relative to industry performance than market performance. Relative performance evaluation is used either by implicitly setting the stock market based performance targets to a level which takes industry performance into account or by adjusting the number of granted shares from year to year. Although I find that relative performance evaluation with respect to total shareholder returns is used in performance share plans, no evidence of the use of relative performance evaluation with respect to ROA is found either in the single-year analysis or the adjusted long-term analysis. The results also show that performance share plan payout ratios are positively and statistically significantly associated with company performance even when the performance is measured during three years instead of one year which is the most common earning period length. en
dc.format.extent 55
dc.language.iso en en
dc.title Relative performance evaluation in performance share plans: Evidence from Finland en
dc.type G2 Pro gradu, diplomityö fi
dc.contributor.school Kauppakorkeakoulu fi
dc.contributor.school School of Business en
dc.contributor.department Department of Finance en
dc.contributor.department Rahoituksen laitos fi
dc.subject.keyword relative performance evaluation
dc.subject.keyword performance share plans
dc.subject.keyword executive compensation
dc.identifier.urn URN:NBN:fi:aalto-201306267071
dc.type.dcmitype text en
dc.programme.major Finance en
dc.programme.major Rahoitus fi
dc.type.ontasot Master's thesis en
dc.type.ontasot Pro gradu tutkielma fi
dc.subject.helecon rahoitus
dc.subject.helecon financing
dc.subject.helecon tulos
dc.subject.helecon return
dc.subject.helecon arviointi
dc.subject.helecon evaluation
dc.subject.helecon palkkiot
dc.subject.helecon remuneration
dc.subject.helecon johtajat
dc.subject.helecon managers
dc.ethesisid 13213
dc.date.dateaccepted 2013-05-20
dc.location P1 I


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search archive


Advanced Search

article-iconSubmit a publication

Browse

My Account