Browsing by Author "Heinonen, Seppo"

Now showing 1 - 10 of 10

The acceptability of implementing patient-reported measures in routine maternity care: A systematic review
(2023-04) Chen, An; Väyrynen, Kirsi; Leskelä, Riikka Leena; Torkki, Paulus; Heinonen, Seppo; Tekay, Aydin; Acharya, Ganesh
A2 Katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Introduction: Patient-reported measures (PRMs) are becoming popular as they might influence clinical decisions, help to deliver patient-centered care, and improve health care quality. However, the limited knowledge and consensus about the acceptability of implementing PRMs in maternity care hinder their widespread use in clinical practice, and evidence-based recommendations are lacking. This systematic review aims to synthesize available evidence on the acceptability of implementing PRMs in routine maternity care. Material and methods: Literature on the implementation of PRMs in maternity care was electronically searched in six databases (PsycARTICLES, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and CINAHL), screened and selected for the topic of “acceptability”. Theoretical Framework of Acceptability was used as the basic framework guiding data analysis and synthesis. Evidence was thematically analyzed and synthesized. Mixed Method Appraisal Tool and GRADE-CERQual approach were used to assess the quality of studies and evaluate the confidence in the review findings. Results: Overall, 4971 articles were screened. From 24 studies, we identified five themes regarding the acceptability of implementing PRMs in routine maternity care: (1) user's action and behavior, (2) stakeholders' attitudes, (3) perceived benefits, (4) perceived challenges and risks, and (5) stakeholders' preferences and suggestions on implementation. While pregnant and postpartum women, health professionals and other stakeholders involved in maternity care were generally positive about the implementation of PRMs in routine care and recognized the potential benefits (e.g., health improvement, women empowerment, care and services improvement and healthcare system advancement), they pointed out possible challenges and risks in answering PRMs questions, responding to answers, and setting up integrated information systems as well as suggested solutions in the aspects of PRMs data collection, follow-up care, and system-level management. The confidence in the review findings was moderate due to methodological limitations of included studies. Conclusions: Available empirical evidence suggested that the use of PRMs in routine maternity care is acceptable among stakeholders involved in maternity care and the potential benefits of its integration in routine clinical practice to healthcare improvement has been recognized. However, possible challenges in data collection, follow-up care arrangement and system-level integration should be appropriately addressed.
Comprehensive self-tracking of blood glucose and lifestyle with a mobile application in the management of gestational diabetes: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (eMOM GDM study)
(2022-11-07) Kytö, Mikko; Markussen, Lisa Torsdatter; Marttinen, Pekka; Jacucci, Giulio; Niinistö, Sari; Virtanen, Suvi M.; Korhonen, Tuuli E.; Sievänen, Harri; Vähä-Ypyä, Henri; Korhonen, Ilkka; Heinonen, Seppo; Koivusalo, Saila B.
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Introduction Gestational diabetes (GDM) causes various adverse short-term and long-term consequences for the mother and child, and its incidence is increasing globally. So far, the most promising digital health interventions for GDM management have involved healthcare professionals to provide guidance and feedback. The principal aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of comprehensive and real-time self-tracking with eMOM GDM mobile application (app) on glucose levels in women with GDM, and more broadly, on different other maternal and neonatal outcomes. Methods and analysis This randomised controlled trial is carried out in Helsinki metropolitan area. We randomise 200 pregnant women with GDM into the intervention and the control group at gestational week (GW) 24-28 (baseline, BL). The intervention group receives standard antenatal care and the eMOM GDM app, while the control group will receive only standard care. Participants in the intervention group use the eMOM GDM app with continuous glucose metre (CGM) and activity bracelet for 1 week every month until delivery and an electronic 3-day food record every month until delivery. The follow-up visit after intervention takes place 3 months post partum for both groups. Data are collected by laboratory blood tests, clinical measurements, capillary glucose measures, wearable sensors, air displacement plethysmography and digital questionnaires. The primary outcome is fasting plasma glucose change from BL to GW 35-37. Secondary outcomes include, for example, self-tracked capillary fasting and postprandial glucose measures, change in gestational weight gain, change in nutrition quality, change in physical activity, medication use due to GDM, birth weight and fat percentage of the child. Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by Ethics Committee of the Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District. The results will be presented in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences. Trial registration number NCT04714762.
Considering medical risk information and communicating values: A mixed-method study of women's choice in prenatal testing
(2017-03-01) Chen, An; Tenhunen, Henni; Torkki, Paulus; Heinonen, Seppo; Lillrank, Paul; Stefanovic, Vedran
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Introduction Nowadays, an important decision for pregnant women is whether to undergo prenatal testing for aneuploidies and which tests to uptake. We investigate the factors influencing women's choices between non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and invasive prenatal tests in pregnancies with elevated a priori risk of fetal aneuploidies. Methodology This is a mixed-method study. We used medical data (1st Jan 2015-31st Dec 2015) about women participating in further testing at Fetomaternal Medical Center at Helsinki University Hospital and employed Chi-square tests and ANOVA to compare the groups of women choosing different methods. Multinomial logistic regressions revealed the significant clinical factors influencing women's choice. We explored the underlying values, beliefs, attitudes and other psychosocial factors that affect women's choice by interviewing women with the Theory of Planned Behavior framework. The semi-structured interview data were processed by thematic analysis. Results Statistical data indicated that gestational age and counseling day were strong factors influencing women's choice. Interview data revealed that women's values and moral principles on pregnancy and childbirth chiefly determined the choices. Behavioral beliefs (e.g. safety and accuracy) and perceived choice control (e.g. easiness, rapidness and convenience) were also important and the major trade-offs happened between these constructs. Discussion Values are the determinants of women's choice. Service availability and convenience are strong factors. Medical risk status in this choice context is not highly influential. Choice AIDS can be developed by helping women to identify their leading values in prenatal testing and by providing lists of value-matching test options and attributes.
Facilitating autonomous, confident and satisfying choices: A mixed-method study of women's choice-making in prenatal screening for common aneuploidies
(2018-05-02) Chen, An; Tenhunen, Henni; Torkki, Paulus; Peltokorpi, Antti; Heinonen, Seppo; Lillrank, Paul; Stefanovic, Vedran
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Background: Population-based prenatal screening has become a common and widely available obstetrical practice in majority of developed countries. Under the patient autonomy principle, women should understand the screening options, be able to take their personal preferences and situations into account, and be encouraged to make autonomous and intentional decisions. The majority of the current research focuses on the prenatal screening uptake rate, women's choice on screening tests, and the influential factors. However, little attention has been paid to women's choice-making processes and experiences in prenatal screening and their influences on choice satisfaction. Understanding women's choice-making processes and experiences in pregnancy and childbirth is the prerequisite for designing women-centered choice aids and delivering women-centered maternity care. This paper presents a pilot study that aims to investigate women's experiences when they make choices for screening tests, quantify the choice-making experience, and identify the experiential factors that affect women's satisfaction on choices they made. Method: We conducted a mixed-method research at Helsinki and Uusimaa Hospital District (HUS) in Finland. First, the women's choice-making experiences were explored by semi-structured interviews. We interviewed 28 women who participated in prenatal screening. The interview data was processed by thematic analysis. Then, a cross-sectional self-completion survey was designed and implemented, assessing women's experiences in choice-making and identifying the experiential factors that influence choice satisfaction. Of 940 distributed questionnaires, 185 responses were received. Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to detect the effects of the variables. Results: We developed a set of measurements for women's choice-making experiences in prenatal screening with seven variables: activeness, informedness, confidence, social pressure, difficulty, positive emotion and negative emotion. Regression revealed that activeness in choice-making (β = 0.176; p = 0.023), confidence in choice-making (β = 0.388; p < 0.001), perceived social pressure (β = - 0.306; p < 0.001) and perceived difficulty (β = - 0.274; p < 0.001) significantly influenced women's choice satisfaction in prenatal screening. Conclusions: This study explores the experiential dimension of women's choice-making in prenatal screening. Our result will be useful for service providers to design women-centered choice environment. Women's willingness and capabilities of making active choices, their preferences, and social reliance should be well considered in order to facilitate autonomous, confident and satisfying choices.
The impact of implementing patient-reported measures in routine maternity care: a systematic review
(2022-11) Chen, An; Väyrynen, Kirsi; Schmidt, Alexandra; Leskelä, Riikka Leena; Torkki, Paulus; Heinonen, Seppo; Tekay, Aydin; Acharya, Ganesh
A2 Katsausartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Introduction: While there is growing interest in applying patient-reported measures (PRMs) in clinical routine, limited collective evidence of the impact of PRMs hinder their widespread use in specific contexts, such as maternity care. Our objective was to synthesize existing empirical evidence on the impact of implementing PRMs in routine maternity care. Material and methods: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines (version 2020). We electronically searched six databases for the literature on the implementation of PRMs in maternity care. A multi-level (woman, clinical, organizational, national and societal) analytic framework for analyzing and synthesizing empirically proven impacts of PRMs was developed. Quality was assessed using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. The GRADE-CERQual approach was used to assess the confidence in the review findings and arguments. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021234501). Results: Overall, 4971 articles were screened. The empirical evidence, collected from 11 relevant studies, showed that the use of PRMs in routine maternity care could produce positive effects on clinical process (assessment and detection of health problems, clinical visit preparation, resource use, woman–professional communication, decision-making, woman–professional relationship, and care quality), and health behavior and outcomes (women's health and wellbeing, quality of life, health behavior, experiences and satisfaction with healthcare services), awareness, engagement and self-management of own health, and disclosure of health issues. The confidence in the review findings was low to moderate due to a limited number of studies, inadequate data and methodological limitations of included studies. Conclusions: The limited empirical evidence available suggested that the use of PRMs may have positive effects at the individual health level and clinical process level. However, the evidence was not strong enough to provide policy recommendations on the use of PRMs in routine maternity care. This review revealed limitations of currently available research, such as lack of generalizability and narrow scopes in investigating impact. Efforts are needed to improve the quality of research on the use of PRMs in routine maternity care by widening the study population, including different types of PRMs, and considering the effects of PRMs at different levels and domains of healthcare.
Introducing standard patient-reported measures (PRMs) into routine maternity care : A pre-implementation qualitative study on women’s perspectives in Finland
(2023-12) Väyrynen, Kirsi; Chen, An; Leskelä, Riikka Leena; Raussi-Lehto, Eija; Klemetti, Reija; Heinonen, Seppo; Torkki, Paulus; Tekay, Aydin
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Background: Systematically using standard patient-reported measures (PRMs) in clinical routines is trending. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) has developed condition-specific standard sets of patient-centred measures, one of which is the Pregnancy and Childbirth Standard (PCB) set, where standard PRMs are included. There is limited knowledge on the use of ICHOM PCB set-included PRMs (ICHOM-PCB-PRMs) in routine care. This study investigates women’s perspectives on the future implementation of standard ICHOM-PCB-PRMs in routine maternity care in Finland. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Pregnant and postpartum women were asked to evaluate each ICHOM-PCB-PRM in several dimensions, e.g., importance and quality of questions, and to provide their views on future implementation in terms of benefits, difficulties, and practices. With the predefined topics and themes, deductive analysis was applied. Ethical committee approval (HUS 220/880/2015) and research permissions were obtained. Results: 22 women participated. Participants felt that most of the ICHOM-PCB-PRMs were important, relevant, understandable, and appropriately designed, and agreed that some changes in ICHOM-PCB-PRMs were needed, e.g., adding other important measures, changing the wording, and adding open-ended questions. Women would be hesitant to answer questions honestly if follow-up actions were unclear. Most “outcome” measures could be asked repeatedly as maternal health status changes over time, and “experience” measures could be asked separately for different service providers. Disagreements regarding data collection at birth were observed. PRMs were regarded as a way for women to express their thoughts and feelings. Our participants were concerned about the possible consequences of negatively answering the PREMs questions and the availability of follow-up care. Participants expected that they could answer short and easy questions digitally before appointments, and that instructions and follow-up actions based on their answers should be available. Conclusion: ICHOM-PCB-PRMs could be applicable in Finnish maternity care, but some modifications may be required. Careful consideration is needed regarding how and when PRMs questions are asked for eliciting more accurate and honest answers and minimizing women feeling judged, embarrassed, or offended. Follow-ups should be available according to women’s responses and needs. This study provides insights on the adoption and implementation of standard PRMs in routine maternity care.
Optimizing postprandial glucose prediction through integration of diet and exercise : Leveraging transfer learning with imbalanced patient data
(2024-08) Hotta, Shinji; Kytö, Mikko; Koivusalo, Saila; Heinonen, Seppo; Marttinen, Pekka
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Background In recent years, numerous methods have been introduced to predict glucose levels using machine-learning techniques on patients’ daily behavioral and continuous glucose data. Nevertheless, a definitive consensus remains elusive regarding modeling the combined effects of diet and exercise for optimal glucose prediction. A notable challenge is the propensity for observational patient datasets from uncontrolled environments to overfit due to skewed feature distributions of target behaviors; for instance, diabetic patients seldom engage in high-intensity exercise post-meal. Methods In this study, we introduce a unique application of Bayesian transfer learning for postprandial glucose prediction using randomized controlled trial (RCT) data. The data comprises a time series of three key variables: continuous glucose levels, exercise expenditure, and carbohydrate intake. For building the optimal model to predict postprandial glucose levels we initially gathered balanced training data from RCTs on healthy participants by randomizing behavioral conditions. Subsequently, we pretrained the model’s parameter distribution using RCT data from the healthy cohort. This pretrained distribution was then adjusted, transferred, and utilized to determine the model parameters for each patient. Results The efficacy of the proposed method was appraised using data from 68 gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) patients in uncontrolled settings. The evaluation underscored the enhanced performance attained through our method. Furthermore, when modeling the joint impact of diet and exercise, the synergetic model proved more precise than its additive counterpart. Conclusion An innovative application of the transfer-learning utilizing randomized controlled trial data can improve the challenging modeling task of postprandial glucose prediction for GDM patients, integrating both dietary and exercise behaviors. For more accurate prediction, future research should focus on incorporating the long-term effects of exercise and other glycemic-related factors such as stress, sleep.
A qualitative study on professionals' attitudes and views towards the introduction of patient reported measures into public maternity care pathway
(2021-07-03) Chen, An; Väyrynen, Kirsi; Leskelä, Riikka Leena; Heinonen, Seppo; Lillrank, Paul; Tekay, Aydin; Torkki, Paulus
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
BACKGROUND: The importance and potential benefits of introducing patient reported measures (PRMs) into health care service have been widely acknowledged, yet the experience regarding their implementation into practice is limited. There is a considerable paucity of research in adopting PRMs in maternity care routine. This study, which utilizes the PRMs included in Pregnancy and Childbirth (PCB) outcome set developed by International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) as sample measures, aims to elicit Finnish professionals' views on PRMs and to explore the applicability of PRMs in Finnish public maternity care. METHODS: This qualitative study, applying semi-structured interviews, described the local professionals' views towards the application of PRMs in Finnish public maternity care. Professionals were asked to assess the PRMs defined in ICHOM PCB set and provide their expectations and concerns on the implementation of PRMs in Finnish public maternity service. RESULTS: Twenty professionals participated in the interviews. Participants agreed on the importance and relevance of the PRMs questions included in ICHOM PCB set for delivering and developing maternity care in Finland. However, they criticized the number and length of questions as well as the recommended time points of data collection. In addition, for a successful implementation, various steps like developing suitable questions, redesigning service pathway and protocols, and motivating women to respond to PRMs questions were considered to be important. Also, some potential obstacles, difficulties and risks associated with the implementation were underlined. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that the implementation of PRMs into Finnish public maternity service is possible, highly relevant and important. However, the adoption of PRMs into routine practice may be challenging and will require a series of efforts. This study shows viewpoints from Finnish professionals who have not participated in developing the ICHOM PCB standard set and provides important insights on the development and implementation of PRMs.
Short-term effect of plant-based Nordic diet versus carbohydrate-restricted diet on glucose levels in gestational diabetes – the eMOM pilot study
(2023-12) Markussen, Lisa Torsdatter; Kivelä, Jemina; Lindström, Jaana; Ashrafi, Reza A.; Heinonen, Seppo; Koivusalo, Saila; Meinilä, Jelena
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä
Background: The optimal nutritional treatment for gestational diabetes (GDM) is still a matter of debate. With increasing rates of GDM and potential negative consequences for the health of mother and child, the best treatment should be established. The Nordic diet with emphasis on plant-based protein show promising health outcomes in other populations but has yet to be investigated in GDM population. The aim of this study, which is part of the “Effect of plant-based Nordic diet versus carbohydrate-restricted diet on glucose levels in gestational diabetes” (eMOM) pilot study was to compare the short-term effects of healthy Nordic diet (HND) and the currently recommended moderate restriction of carbohydrates diet (MCRD) on glucose and lipid metabolism in women with GDM. Methods: This was a randomized crossover where each of the diet interventions (HND and MCRD) were consumed for 3 days with a 3-day wash-out period in between. In total, 42 pregnant women diagnosed with GDM (< 29 + 0 gestational week) were randomized. Glucose data was collected by continuous glucose monitors (CGM, Freestyle Libre®, Abbott, USA) worn for 14 days, and participants gave blood samples before and after diet interventions. The primary outcome was time spent in glucose target range (TIR, < 7.8 mmol/L). TIR, 3-day mean tissue glucose as well as changes in fasting glucose, homeostatic model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and blood lipids were analyzed with paired samples statistical analyses. Results: Thirty-six women with complete 14 days CGM data were analyzed. Both diet interventions produced a high degree of TIR (99% SD 1.8), without a difference between the diets (p = 0.727). The 3-day mean glucose was significantly lower in HND than in MCRD (p = 0,049). Fasting insulin (p = 0,034), insulin resistance (p = 0,030), total and LDL cholesterol (p = 0,023 and 0,008) reduced more in the MCRD diet than the HND. NS differences in any other measure of CGM or blood tests. Conclusions: HND and MCRD did not differ in terms of their short-term effect on TIR. A larger study with sufficient power is needed to confirm the differences in short-term mean glucose, insulin resistance and lipid metabolism. Trial registration: Registered in clinicaltrials.gov (21/09/2018, NCT03681054).
Supporting the Management of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus With Comprehensive Self-Tracking: Mixed Methods Study of Wearable Sensors
(2023) Kytö, Mikko; Koivusalo, Saila; Tuomonen, Heli; Strömberg, Lisbeth; Ruonala, Antti; Marttinen, Pekka; Heinonen, Seppo; Jacucci, Giulio
A1 Alkuperäisartikkeli tieteellisessä aikakauslehdessä